In a tersely worded opinion, a Fayette judge Wednesday refused to throw out $60 million in punitive damages against Shane Ragland for the sniper-style shooting death of a University of Kentucky football player in 1994.
“This court … can find no greater act of reprehensibility than the premeditated, senseless killing of a young man about to enter the prime of his life, particularly in light of the purported motive …” Circuit Judge Thomas Clark wrote. “To lie in wait, in the dark of night, and assassinate a person for purportedly being blackballed from a fraternity years earlier, the court can find no greater reprehensible conduct.”
- Shane Ragland
- Trent DiGiuro
Ragland has admitted to fatally shooting Trent DiGiuro in front of a Woodland Avenue rental house while he was celebrating his upcoming 21st birthday. Police and prosecutors say Ragland was angry because he wrongly believed DiGiuro had gotten him kicked out of a fraternity.
DiGiuro’s family sued Ragland, and in August a jury awarded the family $63.3 million, including $3.3 million in lost wages.
Ragland and his attorneys did not attend the civil trial. But in September, they filed a motion asking for the verdict to be tossed and requesting a new trial.
Clark overruled that motion in an order that became public on Wednesday.




RECENT COMMENTS