Comments on: Ragland wants new trial after $63.3 million verdict

By: Fox

Fox — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:13:13 +0000

Exactly how has he been punished for his crimes, his original sentence was 30 years with parole after 12. As for Raglands life being made miserable! And DiGiuro “should’nt have died”, your argument is specious
He was MURDERED there is a difference and it should not be just swept under the carpet and forgot about.

By: larry in lex

larry in lex — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:27:37 +0000

shane ragland has been punished for his crimes.the court dished out what they saw fit.everyone knows 63 million dollars was to much money to award the family of the victim.the victim was a bully who also made shane raglands life miserable while at UofK.I HEAR NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THAT.he should’nt have died for it but he did so lets move on.

By: diana tipton

diana tipton — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:49:45 +0000

the justice system has to stop letting money buy there way out. what does it make the people serving time feel about justice. whats fair about this a rich murderer or a poor murderer its got to stop

By: Mubs

Mubs — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:10:40 +0000

Really? I mean really he’s still crying? Someone get this baby a pacifier! Please I’m sick of seeing him squirm out of everything! Hey Mr. Ragland spend your money on charity instead of this lost cause!

By: Crutnacker

Crutnacker — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:05:47 +0000

I sincerely hope that the courts provide Shane Ragland with a strongly worded statement that a confessed murderer who doesn’t bother to defend himself in a civil suit deserves no reconsideration of that civil suit.

I think it is time that people start investigating the source of Shane’s money, namely his father. I’m guessing that Shane’s attitude that laws don’t apply to him didn’t just spring up overnight. What would happen if people started to dig into Jerry Ragland’s connections and contracts? And what would happen to Shane if that source of money suddenly disappeared?

By: Joe LeDuc

Joe LeDuc — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:31:07 +0000

Ragland was released to “home incarceration” between criminal trials. He eventually made a guilty plea and was given credit for “time served” in “home incarceration.” Why hasn’t anybody investigated how he was able to go to Frankfort restaurants during the time he was supposed to be incarcerated at home? He also spent a good bit of time on the river during this period, but I guess he was “at home” there.

Justice has just been served in the Mel Ignatow case. Shane should make sure his parents remove all the glass tables from their house or karma may bite him too.

By: Greg

Greg — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:33:44 +0000

The Raglands are true trash. Would love to see them suffer. I know they will get what is coming to them eventually but it won’t happen soon enough for me…His dad is a ral piece of work….Good job dad. I hope you are proud of what you have raised…A lying murderous piece of scum. Just like daddy.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:31:48 +0000

He should be made to work in prison for 1 dollar a day the rest of his life and pay it to the family of the victim. Everyone in there should be made to do that, instead of getting away with playing cards and lifting weights! MAKE THEM PAY!! just my thoughts! god bless trents family!

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:17:19 +0000

For a person who claims he has no money.

WHY WORRY!!

It’s a shame to waste the courts time with this trash.
He should be hung and forgotten.
The courts should hear5 no more arguments from him or his ?lawyers.
They the ?lawyers are just trying to get all the money they can.
These?lawyers are no better than the ones being tried over and over on court.

Guess they’ll start advertising on tv next.
Birds of a feather.

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:05:25 +0000

Shows what a SCUMBAG he and his family are, Ragland is a murderer!
I hope the courts deny his request.